The Saturday before last (May 22), I read a paper at the Music and the Moving Image Conference at the NYU Steinhardt School of Culture, Education, and Human Development. What a great experience! Usually at conferences I have to hunt down the papers on topics that interest me. Here I had to make a number 0f painful decisions when two interesting presentations were being given simultaneously!
As usual, I’m posting the paper as I read it at the conference.Â Click here to download a PDF version of the paper. Slides and visual examples appear at the end of the PDF. A streaming video of my presentation can be found here (panel #18), but I haven’t been able to open the file.
Follow the jump to read an HTML version of the paper.
John Cage squeezing a rubber duck on Iâ€™ve Got a Secret, February 24, 1960
(Yeah, yeah… I know… It’s not a Zappa paper per se. But it is highly relevant to the chapter I’m currently working on that considers Cage’s influence on Zappa and his contemporaries. More to come!)
Laughter Over Tears: John Cage, Experimental Art Music, and Popular Television
[Click the images to see the slides at full resolution.]
Despite the programâ€™s title, contestants on the CBS game show Iâ€™ve Got a Secret typically had something to reveal. Each round on the show would begin with contestants disclosing to the host and audience an unusual, embarrassing, or otherwise humorous fact about themselves. They would then answer a series of questions from a panel of celebrities who attempted to uncover the secret.
For instance, avant-garde composer John Cage appeared on the show on February 24, 1960.
His secretâ€”that he was going to perform his composition Water Walkâ€”elicited confused looks from host Garry Moore and laughter from the audience when it was revealed that the instrumentation would include, among other things, an electric mixer, a rubber duck, a sprinkling can, and a mechanical fish. Judging from the reactions of the host and studio audience, Cageâ€™s suggestion that such unorthodox instruments would be capable of producing music would have registered with most viewers as contentious if not outright absurd. A fair amount of brow raising and furrowing accompanies the pre-performance conversation. When Moore asks the composer if he considers the piece to be â€œmusic,â€ Cage responds, â€œPerfectly seriously, I consider music the production of sound. And since, in the piece which you will hear I produce sound, I will call it music.â€ Perhaps fearing the worst, Moore assures the audience that the performance is not intended as â€œsome sort of a stuntâ€ and produces a newspaper review to prove that â€œthe [New York Herald] Tribune takes [Cage] seriously as a composer and this as a new art form.â€ But for all the controversy Water Walk stirs, the performance itself is remarkably successful and concludes with Cage beaming at the enthusiastic applause of the studio audience.
Avant-garde art music and primetime television hardly seem likely bedfellows and I am concerned here with how such a pairing as this could have come about. In this paper, I argue that the success of Cageâ€™s performance is linked to a particular point in timeâ€”one in which Cageâ€™s aesthetic philosophy became momentarily lined up with the evolving programming ideologies of broadcast television in the mid-twentieth century. Central to this alignment was Cageâ€™s growing interest in the visual aspects of musical performance.
I will begin with a brief biographical discussion of Cageâ€™s development as a composer, tracing his engagement with visuality and theatricality to a performance at Black Mountain College in 1952. I will then present a close analysis of differences between Water Walk and its modelâ€”the 1952 concert piece Water Musicâ€”to demonstrate how Cage approached the televised medium. Finally, I will conclude with an examination of discussions from this period regarding the nature of the performing arts on television and how Cage found a place in this still young medium.
I. John Cage and the visual aspects of musical performance
In Water Walk, the traditional elements of musicâ€”things like rhythm, meter, melody, harmonyâ€”are virtually absent. That Cage should call such a composition â€œmusicâ€ is likely what made the piece appealing to a program like Iâ€™ve Got a Secret. And yet, Cageâ€™s description of Water Walkâ€”a piece of music consisting of organized soundâ€”seems lacking with regard to the ensuing demonstration. The visual elements of the performance were emphasized in such a way as to suggest that merely listening to the audible dimension of the performance would result in a decidedly incomplete experience of the piece.
Much has been written on Cageâ€™s musical experiments involving the use of chance operations and his philosophical views on silence. Comparatively little discussion has been devoted to the theatrical nature of his work and his interest in the visual aspects of musical performance. In one of the few studies devoted to the subject, William Fetterman discusses Cageâ€™s â€œtheater piecesâ€â€”what he defines as, â€œcompositions which in themselves are aural as well as visual in performance.â€ Like Fetterman, I too am interested in how Cageâ€™s work incorporates specifically visual elements amongst the more traditional sound events.
The roots of Cageâ€™s interest in theatricality may be traced at least as far back as his involvement with the Cornish School in Seattle, Washington. There, Cage served as composer and accompanist for dance and theater performances from September 1938 to the summer of the following year. Close collaborations with dancers and choreographers imparted on Cage a new appreciation for the visual nature of artistic performanceâ€”an influence observable in his percussion pieces from this period. It was also at the Cornish School that Cage first met dancer/choreographer Merce Cunningham. Their lifelong partnership would result in many fruitful collaborations and would be a profound influence on Cageâ€™s work, particularly with regards to how music and sound interact with the other arts.
In a 1987 retrospective of his life and work, Cage himself stresses the importance of his time in Seattle:
Experience with dance led me [to incorporate theatrical elements]. The reflection that a human being isnâ€™t just ears but also has eyes [â€¦]. I found through Oriental philosophy, my work with Suzuki, that what we are doing is living, and that we are not moving toward a goal but are, so to speak, at the goal constantly and changing with it, and that art, if it is going to do anything useful, should open our eyes to this fact.
Aside from the connection to dance, we see in this quotation that Cageâ€™s motivation in incorporating visual elements is holisticâ€”inspired by his own spirituality and interest in Zen philosophy. By engaging with the theatrical aspects of performance, Cage attempts to render the experience of art more like that of life itselfâ€”to use his words: the â€œtesting of art by means of life.â€
A pivotal moment in Cageâ€™s developing fascination with theatricality was an untitled event at Black Mountain College in North Carolina. The largely freeform performanceâ€”often described as the original â€œhappeningâ€â€”took place in the schoolâ€™s dining hall in the summer of 1952. During the event, Cage stood atop a ladder reading a lecture while his collaborators performed works of their own: Merce Cunningham danced, M.C. Richards & Charles Olson read poetry, David Tudor played piano, and Robert Rauschenberg showed slides of his all-white paintings with phonograph accompaniment. The audience was seated throughout the room, experiencing the multi-faceted performance from all angles.
Though seemingly an impromptu event, the performance was planned at least to the extent that Cage assigned each collaborator one or more overlapping time brackets in which to perform. Many of Cageâ€™s compositions in the years following the Black Mountain event would be constructed using a similar structure, in which events are scheduled within pre-determined temporal boundaries. The interdisciplinarity of the eventâ€”a frenetic conglomeration of aural and visual art formsâ€”would be another important point of influence. Musicologist Leta E. Miller describes the event as a turning point in Cageâ€™s artistic career: the beginning of a new approach to composition, but also the culmination of the various collaborative projects that had occupied him in previous years.
Cage closely associated the 1952 composition of Water Music with the Black Mountain event. As he would later recall, â€œWater Music comes from 1952, I believeâ€”the same year as the Black Mountain showâ€”and was my immediate reaction to that event.â€ In reality, Water Music was premiered several months before the Black Mountain happening in a performance by David Tudor at the New School for Social Research in New York City. Cageâ€™s confusion of the chronology seems to show how closely connected he saw the two works because of their similar incorporation of non-musical elements.
II. Water Music to Water Walk
Water Music is generally considered to be the first of Cageâ€™s so-called â€œtheater pieces.â€ As biographer David Nicholls has noted, â€œthe piece is as much theatrical as purely musical.â€ Cage describes the piece as follows:
Water Music wishes to be a piece of music, but to introduce visual elements in such a way that it can be experienced as theater. [â€¦] I simply put into the chart things that would produce not only sounds but that would produce actions that were interesting to see.
Cageâ€™s engagement with theater isâ€”at least in this caseâ€”wholly based on the addition of visual stimuli to supplement and correspond with musical events. In Water Music, the viewer/listener is presented not only with a view of the stage and the now-emphasized actions that produce the sound, but also with a glimpse at the conception of the piece and the perspective of the performer via the oversize score. Cage specifies that the 55″ x 34″ score is to be displayed in such a way that the notation is visible not only to the performer, but to the audience as well. In this way, visual elements are intended to bring the audience closer to the world of the performer and to the composer himself. By the late 1950s and early 1960s, Cageâ€™s experiments with visual elements had become a central concern. Compositions like his Music Walk, Theater Piece, and Variations IV are entirely focused on their engagement with theater. Water Walk, a 1959 reworking of Water Music, belongs to this group.
In January of 1959, Cage appeared as a contestant on the Italian game show Lascia o Raddoppia. (The title may be loosely translated as â€œdouble or nothing.â€)
An accomplished mycologist, Cage opted to answer a series of question about mushrooms. With each successful round of questions, Cage was invited back the next night. More importantly, for each appearance he was also invited to perform one of his own compositions. Several of theseâ€”Water Walk includedâ€”were written specifically for the occasion. It is important to keep in mind, when discussing the role of visuality in the piece, that Water Walk was designed for performance on television. Indeed, the published score indicates that the composition is specifically intended for a â€œsolo television performer.â€
Enough elements are retained in Water Walk to make evident its connection to Water Music. Both pieces use radios, prepared piano, various bird calls and whistles, andâ€”as their titles suggestâ€”water. Beyond similarities in instrumentation and execution, however, the pieces are remarkably different. Water Walk places a far greater emphasis on visuality. The very name of the piece implies movementâ€”Water Walk as opposed to Water Music. Whereas the earlier piece could, presumably, be performed all while sitting at the piano, Water Walk requires the performer to physically move about the stage area. By giving the dimensions of the requisite tables and a suggested performance layout, Cage all but provides an explicit choreography of the entire performance.
Even the score for Water Walk is more visual than Water Music, relying on pictograms instead of musical notation and extensive written directions. The expanded instrumentation, too, seems determined by the visual recognizability of the objects. In his performance on Iâ€™ve Got a Secret, Cage makes a point of holding up the sound-producing objects so that the audience has a very clear view of them.
For instance, when the score indicates that a rubber duck is to be squeezed, it is not just for the sound it makes; all of the associations that accompany the toy must be present as well. In other words, a recording of a rubber duck would not command the same whimsical associations.
This interpretation differs from that of James Pritchett who, in his book The Music of John Cage, contends that even in Cageâ€™s theatrical works, â€œless strictly musical actions are marginalâ€ and â€œtreated as if they were sounds.â€ Indeed, I would suggest that Cageâ€™s own performance of Water Walk speaks to the importance of visuality in such pieces and indicates that events are not merely included for their sound alone.
Compared to Water Musicâ€”essentially a concert piece for solo pianistâ€”Water Walk is much more animated. It features a far greater variety of instruments and objects to be used by the performer: thirty-four played over three brief minutes. (Water Music, by comparison, has only thirteen stretched over the course of its six minutes and forty seconds.) Water Walkâ€™s frantic pacing could almost be described as slapstick, an effect that Cage seems to have had in mind. Before the performance on Iâ€™ve Got a Secret, a jurisdictional union dispute over who was responsible for plugging in the radios left Cage lacking an essential element of his arsenal. Compensating for the loss of functioning radios, Cage decided to hit the radios when he would normally turn them on and knock them off the table when he would normally turn them off.
This decision, though made in the heat of the moment, has a poetic significance that is hard to ignore. While accommodating the unexpected constraints of live television, Cage symbolically dismisses the notion of music as consisting only of sound by literally smashing apart the technological embodiment of this idea. In other words, Cage rejects the concept of radio while performing on television. The gesture draws a parallel between Cageâ€™s increasing interest in the visual aspects of musical performance and the increasing cultural dominance of television over radio.
The audience, though never seen, is heard clearly throughout the performance. They react with laughter to Cageâ€™s suggestion that such sounds can be considered musicâ€”tentative at first, then uproarious when the radios hit the ground. If we judge Cageâ€™s performance on Iâ€™ve Got a Secret by the audienceâ€™s reaction and obvious look of satisfaction on Cageâ€™s face at the conclusion, then the performance was a complete success. But how could this unlikely pairing have come about? How could avant-garde art musicâ€”often dismissed by the uninitiated as wildly inaccessibleâ€”have found such success with a comedy game show audience? To answer these questions, one must consider the various discourses surrounding and shaping the first few decades of televisionâ€™s existence.
III. Variety shows as vaudeville and a place for the avant-garde
During the 1940s and 1950s, as television grew rapidly into a dominant force in American culture, much of the discourse surrounding this new medium was concerned with how it wouldâ€”or shouldâ€”develop as an emergent performative art form. As Brian Geoffrey Rose explains in his book Television and the Performing Arts, â€œ[e]xperimentation was the order of the day, with no one quite certain what formats would work.â€ Looking at the commentary of programmers, executives, critics, and journalists, we see a number of forces pulling on television, shaping it to meet various cultural needs.
One of the most outspoken groups in these debates was comprised of individuals who predictedâ€”or at least hopedâ€”that television would emerge as an entirely new art form. This group recognized televisionâ€™s potential. The added visual element made the new medium a rich mode of artistic expression, while the possibility of multiple visual perspectives made it infinitely more versatile than traditional live performance where the listener/viewerâ€™s experience is constrained by their immobile place in the audience. Proponents of televisionâ€™s status as an autonomous mode of expression put it on equal footing with other western art forms like opera, ballet, or cinema. As one enthusiastic writer put it: â€œTelevision shall become the instrument for the highest form of artistic expression ever attained to by man since the 16th century.â€
Other commentators were not quite so enthusiastic. To them, television seemed better-suited to supplement existing art forms. Much of this discussion was fueled by the widely-held belief that television networks should provide their viewers with culturally edifying programming. In 1952, for example, NBC launched â€œOperation Frontal Lobes,â€ an effort to do just this. According to network executive Sylvester Weaver, the purpose of the project was to
expose all of our people to the thrilling rewards that come from an understanding of fine music, ballet, the literary classics, science, art, everything. [â€¦] To make us all into intellectualsâ€”there is the challenge of television.
These sense of civic duty were further fueled by pressure from the FCC and other outside interest groups. Some of the resulting programs enjoyed modest success. Shows like Omnibus, Camera Three, Look Up and Live, Lamp Unto My Feet, and Directions tirelessly provided cultural programming for yearsâ€”even avant-garde performancesâ€”and were instrumental in pushing the creative and artistic boundaries of the medium. But cultural programming was not economically viable and most of these shows were relegated to Sunday morning time slots where networks could fulfill their perceived obligations without the risk of alienating viewers and losing primetime sponsors.
According to Rose, the failure of cultural programming was due in part to the cultural baggage of these traditions. Classical music, for example, was widely perceived as lacking the visual excitement needed to succeed on television. But where classical music failed to appeal to television audiences, another idiom found success. Many commentators on early television recognized the potential for a revitalizationâ€”or, perhaps, renaissanceâ€”of Vaudeville. As Murray Forman points out, discussions of early television were often characterized by a â€œrhetoric of opportunity.â€ When broadcast radio and cinema led to the much-lamented decline of vaudeville in the 1920s and 1930s, many performers and managers turned to television as a promising source of employment.
In a 1950 piece for Hollywood Quarterly, WPIX production manager Rudy Bretz describes those qualities of television which contribute to its unique projection of livenessâ€”to use his words: its â€œimmediacy, spontaneity, and actuality.â€
According to Bretz, the viewerâ€™s sense that a television program is happening concurrently, has never happened before, and is a real performance all work together to create a unique mediumâ€”one that, in the economic climate of the 1950s, was particularly well-suited to facilitating a vaudeville revival. We may, in this light, view the variety show format that emerged on television around this timeâ€”and to which game shows like Iâ€™ve Got a Secret were closely relatedâ€”as heir to the vaudeville tradition. The quick succession of brief, stylistically disjunct performances, and the central role of humor in variety shows are immediately reminiscent of vaudeville idioms.
The qualities described by Bretz are exactly what Cage would have found exciting about television. â€œImmediacy, spontaneity, and actualityâ€ could just as accurately describe the intended effect of Cageâ€™s theater pieces. The unique livenessâ€”the reality of televised performanceâ€”resonates with Cageâ€™s â€œtesting of art by means of life.â€ Performances of Water Walk on television work not because avant-garde music fulfilled cultural obligations, but because they fit with the programming ideals of mid-century American television. The shorter length of the piece, the marked focus on visuality, and the comically rapid pace of performance all make the piece remarkably well-suited to the vaudeville-cum-variety show context of Iâ€™ve Got a Secret.
*Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â *Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â *
I would like to suggest, then, that Cageâ€™s success on television was not born out of any singular decision on the part of the composer. Nor was it the result of television producers exploiting Cage, framing him as a novelty act. Rather, I see these achievements as the product of momentarily intersecting trajectories. Leading up to the late 1950s, Cageâ€™s development as a composer brought him closer and closer to the ever-congealing ideals of broadcast television.
It might be tempting to think that in reworking Water Music to become Water Walk Cage had compromised his artistic integrityâ€”selling out by pandering to the tastes of television audiences. But in fact, the opposite seems to be true. Television offered Cage an opportunity to tease out the artistic possibilities suggested by his earlier work. It might be similarly tempting to think of Cage as having used television as a promotional tool. But here again, the motive doesnâ€™t quite seem to fit. Despite the success of his few appearances on television, this does not seem to be a venue that Cage pursued after 1960. Nor would it be accurate to attribute Cageâ€™s appearances on television to the perceived obligations of network programmers. Though we might now associate John Cage with the world of art musicâ€”as Cage himself would have at the timeâ€”Water Walk is a far cry from typical â€œhigh-culturalâ€ performances.
The rhetoric of the classical music tradition is often preoccupied with musicâ€™s ability to move the listener to tears. Television audiences, however,â€”often described as voracious consumers of lighthearted materialâ€”have historically been much more interested in laughing. In fact, it is this very departure from Western classical ideals that make Water Walk and popular television such an ideal match. Just before the performance of Water Walk on Iâ€™ve Got a Secret, Garry Moore said to Cage, â€œThese are nice people, but some of them are going to laugh. Is that alright?â€ â€œOf course!â€ came Cageâ€™s gleeful reply, â€œI consider laughter preferable to tears.â€
Pingback: ãƒ«ã‚¤ ãƒ´ã‚£ãƒˆãƒ³ é’å±± é§„ã€…(ãƒ€ãƒ€)()
Pingback: cheap csgo skins()
Pingback: Magisé”›å ›å„ªéŠˆæžå£é”›?EUå§ï½ˆî›´é?éŠˆè£¤å„¬éŠˆè£¤å„¬ éŠˆå¹¿å„ŽéŠ‰ç¬ºå„·/éŠ‰î…œå…—éŠ‰ä½µå‹éŠˆ?SD360 Tam Tam()
Pingback: what is mulberry()
Pingback: ã‚·ãƒ£ãƒãƒ«æ™‚è¨ˆ ãƒ¬ãƒ‡ã‚£ãƒ¼ã‚¹ äººæ°— é•·è²¡å¸ƒ()
Pingback: cheap handbags()
Pingback: handbags online()
Pingback: borse gucci outlet italia()
Pingback: mulberry uk()
Pingback: chaussure semelle rouge louboutin()
Pingback: official mcm website()
Pingback: purses & handbags()
Pingback: electric scooter()
Pingback: hermes pro()
Pingback: Brazilian body wave()
Pingback: orologio donna alviero martini()
Pingback: mulberry factory shop shepton mallet()
Pingback: hermes bag sale()
Pingback: dasein handbags()
Pingback: rouge hermes()
Pingback: hollister online shop deutschland()
Pingback: mcm luggage()
Pingback: mcm bookbag()
Pingback: ã‚·ãƒ£ãƒãƒ« ãƒãƒ¼ãƒ ä¾¡æ ¼()
Pingback: toms outlet()
Pingback: Site De Chaussure Pas Cher()
Pingback: prada borse outlet()
Pingback: expensive handbags()
Pingback: sac birkin hermes()
Pingback: mens ray ban()
Pingback: mulberry bags uk()
Pingback: ãƒ‰ãƒ³ãƒ»ã‚ãƒ›ãƒ¼ãƒ† ã‚·ãƒ£ãƒãƒ«æ™‚è¨ˆ ãƒ—ãƒ«ãƒŸã‚¨ãƒ¼ãƒ«()
Pingback: counter strike()
Pingback: Wholesale Oakley twoface sunglasses red and black smoke grey iridium outlet()
Pingback: ãƒãƒ¬ãƒƒã‚¯ã‚¹ ãƒ¬ãƒ‡ã‚£ãƒ¼ã‚¹ è©•ä¾¡ usj()
Pingback: ã‚¹ãƒ¼ãƒ‘ãƒ¼ã‚³ãƒ”ãƒ¼ supreme()
Pingback: ãƒãƒ¬ãƒƒã‚¯ã‚¹ å½ç‰© è¦‹åˆ†ã‘æ–¹()
Pingback: ã‚¹ãƒ¼ãƒ‘ãƒ¼ã‚³ãƒ”ãƒ¼ è²¡å¸ƒ ãƒãƒ¬ãƒ³ã‚·ã‚¢ã‚¬()
Pingback: madden 17 coins()
Pingback: ãƒŸãƒ¥ã‚¦ãƒŸãƒ¥ã‚¦ãƒãƒƒã‚° ã‚³ãƒ¼ãƒ‡()
Pingback: ãƒãƒ¬ãƒƒã‚¯ã‚¹æ™‚è¨ˆ amazon()
Pingback: ã‚¹ãƒ¼ãƒ‘ãƒ¼ã‚³ãƒ”ãƒ¼ é€šè²© ç¨Žé–¢()
Pingback: ãƒãƒ¬ãƒƒã‚¯ã‚¹ å½ç‰© è¦‹åˆ†ã‘æ–¹ ã‚µãƒ–ãƒžãƒªãƒ¼ãƒŠ 93150()
Pingback: ãƒ–ãƒ©ãƒ³ãƒ‰æ¿€å®‰ ç€æ‰•ã„ æ–™é‡‘()
Pingback: ã‚¿ã‚°ãƒ›ã‚¤ãƒ¤ãƒ¼ äººæ°—()